Many young people and older people too.
Many young people and older people too. The spectrum of human capability, and the potential to be valued and productive in life, are much broader than this, which are central aspects of multiple intelligence theory. Encouraging people to think beyond traditional academic measures of value and talent is a vital early step to enabling better self-esteem and bigger personal belief, confidence and aspiration.
Is this test scientifically validated or normed?. This free Multiple Intelligences testing instrument has not been scientifically validated or normed. If your research or study requires the use of a scientifically validated instrument then this instrument may not be suitable for your work.
This instrument is a simple directly reflective assessment tool which works in a single dimension. That is, the results are produced directly from the inputs the scored answers to the statement questions.
There are no complex computations or correlations or scaling. As such it less prone to distortion or confusion than a more complicated testing methodology might be, especially one involving convoluted formulae or scales on several dimensions.
The instrument in its various versions has been downloaded and used tens of thousands of times by teachers, trainers, managers, academics, and researchers all around the world sinceand to my knowledge has not generated any complaint or criticism about its reliability and suitability for purpose.
Additionally, this webpage featuring the instrument download links has been highly ranked top five or so in Google's listings for keywords such as 'multiple intelligence tests' for several years and remains so, with zero advertising and promotion, which is perhaps a virtual validation of sorts.
That said, I repeat, the instrument has not been scientifically validated, and where you are definitely required to use an instrument that has been scientifically validated or normed, then this free tool is probably not the right one for you. Principles and Interpretation Howard Gardner asserts certain principles relating to his multiple intelligence theory, which are explained and interpreted here, along with implications and examples: The types of intelligence that a person possesses Gardner suggests most of us are strong in three types indicates not only a persons capabilities, but also the manner or method in which they prefer to learn and develop their strengths - and also to develop their weaknesses.
A person who is strong musically and weak numerically will be more likely to develop numerical and logical skills through music, and not by being bombarded by numbers alone. A person who is weak spatially and strong numerically, will be more likely to develop spatial ability if it is explained and developed by using numbers and logic, and not by asking them to pack a suitcase in front of an audience.
A person who is weak bodily and physically and strong numerically might best be encouraged to increase their physical activity by encouraging them to learn about the mathematical and scientific relationships between exercise, diet and health, rather than forcing them to box or play rugby.
The pressure of possible failure and being forced to act and think unnaturally, have a significant negative influence on learning effectiveness.
Happy relaxed people learn more readily than unhappy stressful people.
A person's strength is also a learning channel. A person's weakness is not a great learning channel. When you add in what we know about personal belief and confidence it all begins to make even more sense.
Develop people through their strengths and we not only stimulate their development - we also make them happy because everyone enjoys working in their strength areas - and we also grow their confidence and lift their belief because they see they are doing well, and they get told they are doing well too.
Developing a person's strengths will increase their response to the learning experience, which helps them to develop their weaknesses as well as their strengths. Having illustrated that sensible use of a person's natural strengths and types of intelligence is a good thing it's important to point out that intelligence in itself is not a measure of good or bad, nor of happy or sad.
The different intelligences - in Gardner's context and normally in most other interpretations and definitions of the term - are not a measure or reflection of emotion type. Intelligences are emotionally neutral. No type of intelligence is in itself an expression of happiness or sadness; nor an expression of feeling good or good or bad.
In the same way, the multiple intelligences are morally neutral too. No type of intelligence is intrinsically right or wrong. In other words intelligences are amoral, that is, neither moral nor immoral - irrespective of a person's blend of intelligences.
Intelligences are separate to the good or bad purposes to which people apply whatever intelligences they possess and use.
Intelligences are not in themselves good or bad. The types of intelligences that a person possesses are in themselves no indication or reflection - whatsoever - of whether the person is good or bad; happy or sad, right or wrong.
People possess a set of intelligences - not just one type and level of intelligence. This was a primary driver of Gardner's thinking; the fact, or assertion, that intelligence is not a single scalable aspect of a person's style and capability.
Gardener has demonstrated that this notion is ridiculous.Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences is primarily concerned with the fact that traditional education doesn’t take into account the different abilities that human beings possess that all lead to learning (Acosta, 16) - Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences Essay introduction.
One child may learn a concept rather quickly but struggle with another while another child may struggle with the . Howard Gardner: ‘Multiple intelligences’ are not ‘learning styles’ The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Intelligence: We all have the multiple intelligences.
But we . This report concludes that Ml theory did not discover new “intelligences”, but rather, put forth a reframing of what others have defined as cognitive styles.
An analysis of gardner's theory of multiple intelligence: Roeper Review: Vol 18, No 4.
Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligence Theory was first published in Howard Gardner's book, Frames Of Mind (), and quickly became established as a classical model by which to understand and teach many aspects of human intelligence, learning style, personality and behaviour - in education and industry.
For more information about the theory of Multiple Intelligences, What Does the Research Say? You may also want to watch an interview with Howard Gardner: Big Thinkers: Howard Gardner on Multiple Intelligences. How much time do you spend: None Only a little A fair amount and explore sample activities related to different .
Theory of multiple intelligences The theory of multiple intelligences was proposed by Howard Gardner in as a model of intelligence that differentiates intelligence into various specific (primarily sensory) modalities[disambiguation needed], rather than seeing it as dominated by a single general ability.